Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#94923 05/21/07 11:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,134
Member/1500+posts
Member/1500+posts
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,134
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cess...Z004QQcategoryZ63677QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Could be an expensive project to get the paperwork legal.


Tim
'76 C-150M, San Antonio
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Ahhhhhh, the infamous 'H' motor. Such an excellent boat anchor. crazy

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,782
Likes: 544
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,782
Likes: 544
The O-320-H2AD taught Lycoming to never again introduce an engine with an "AD" in the model name.... frown

Because of the paperwork hassle this airplane would almost best be sold for parts. Or trade the O-320 for a good O-200 and turn it back into a normal 150. Alternatively, a buyer in Canada could de-certify it and fly under their owner-maintenance program. That would be neat!


-Kirk Wennerstrom
President, Cessna 150-152 Fly-In Foundation
1976 Cessna Cardinal RG N7556V
Hangar D1, Bridgeport, CT KBDR
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
I quote from the ad:
Quote
Not H2AD no paper work for engine change

log books are not up todate no recent annual

aircraft is together engine can be run


This sounds like a good deal to walk away from! eek


Pat

Never run out of altitude, airspeed, and ideas at the same time.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
J
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
Are the H2AD mounts the same as the E2D and other allowable engines? Could be an engine core swap if the STC is there as it indicates, but as Patrick says....with all of these "non-certified" issues, you have to wonder what else is lurking so...

don't walk....RUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
Member/250+posts
Member/250+posts
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Kirk
Alternatively, a buyer in Canada could de-certify it and fly under their owner-maintenance program. That would be neat!


Ya...just make sure there's no existing liens on the airplane from the freakn''60's on it.

I just hear the word "decertify" and I start to cringe. cry


1959 150
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,015
B
Member/1000+posts
Member/1000+posts
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,015
Check the Regs. but I think an aircraft has to be certified first and then put in the 'owner maintenance' category, in Canada.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
Sounds like our Canadian friends will have at least as many headaches as us Yanks getting that plane legal again. sick


Pat

Never run out of altitude, airspeed, and ideas at the same time.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0