So, I believe it's a copyright infringement to sell a manual based on this CD. I bet if you call them up they'll tell you the same thing.
I do not have the McCurtain CD's for the 150. However, I did buy the CD with the Service Information on it. The one I bought only had 1946 up to 1961, and I have everything since then up to 1978, in print originals. I think they now offer the Service Information Summaries from 1946 to 1976 on one CD for $40. Mine cost $30 and only has '46 to '61 (thats all they offered at the time). I plan on making a hard copy of this entire CD on my laser printer and binding it, as all my other Service Information Summaries are in print. It is more useful for me to have it in print. This is of course, for my own use at my own home.
This Service Information Summaries CD also would be a wise investment for the 150 owner, especially if your mechanic is a parttimer, works only on a couple of aircraft and doesn't have a shop or manuals.
http://www.mccurtaintg.com/cessna9.htmI do think, however, McCurtain has "added value" to the Service manual CD and possibly the IPC by including selected Service publications and AD's. Correct me if I am wrong but I think I read where they did this.
Their software license says you cannot copy the software but one backup for your own protection, but it really doesn't address reproducing the contents of the CD on paper.
However, if someone approached Kyle and PROVED to him they owned that CD (by providing a copy of the invoice) and said, "I don't have a laser printer and want a print copy to take to the airport" I see nothing wrong with him printing them a copy of it (provided they own an original of the CD) and charging them for the print and postage costs. It wouldn't be much different than taking it to Kinkos and having them print it.
Simply selling the IPC's printed from the CD, without the buyer owning the original McCurtain CD is not right and I agree with Matthew and Steve, a copyright violation since McCurtain has added value to the product in several ways and do claim copyright to it.
Steve and I both decided it would be best to ask Royson to delete this thread, but I am now wondering if we just need to have Kyle retract or modify his printing offer. The discussion is good, enlightening and informative, and may help other McCurtain product owners in the future.
Charles