Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hung #496712 01/24/16 10:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 49
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 49
Hung... You're Awesome... I have a bottle of "home brew" reserved for you at Clinton this year!


[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,412
Likes: 995
Member/25,000 posts
Member/25,000 posts
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,412
Likes: 995
Originally Posted by Joshua_Ralph
Hung...I have a bottle of "home brew" reserved for you at Clinton this year!


Thanks for the thought and the offer. I don't/can't drink, but I'll raise my Diet Mt. Dew in a toast of our new acquaintance grin.


[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,096
Likes: 21
Member/5000+posts!
Member/5000+posts!
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,096
Likes: 21
Originally Posted by Joshua_Ralph
Question about Oil temp...
On my commute to Iowa yesterday the Oil Pressure remained rock steady right in the green range... The Oil temp however failed to rise even a little bit.

During my 3 hr BFR (haven't flown a stiff wing in forever) acceptance flight of N61112 I noticed no rise in oil temp. Outside air temps were between 10 and 30 degrees. Should I be concerned?


At temps below 20F, if you don't have a winter kit (restrictor baffles) in the cowl I wouldn't be surprised. It's entirely possible that it just isn't warming up enough to register a visible change on the gauge - especially if you were cruising lower power settings.

At least, that's my experience this past year. I've flown FJBN in temps from -25C to +30C, and in the colder temps it can be difficult to tell if the oil temp needle moves at all, particularly for shorter or low power flights. An extended climb at full power will definitely result in easily visible movement, so if in doubt - try a 15 min full power climb.


150M C-FJBN


Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 14
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 14
Hi. Yes the 150/150 looks like it would fit my needs perfect, if I could double the the fuel capacity. With standard tanks it doesn't seem like it would work.
Seems like a wealth energy and information here! It is enjoyable to read through the excitement.


Todd
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,925
Likes: 411
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,925
Likes: 411
Originally Posted by Todd_Frownfelter
Hi. Yes the 150/150 looks like it would fit my needs perfect, if I could double the the fuel capacity. With standard tanks it doesn't seem like it would work.
Seems like a wealth energy and information here! It is enjoyable to read through the excitement.


While long range tanks are nice, there are some things to consider.

There's the added weight. The factory style long range tanks are great in that they enlarge the existing tanks but leave the fuel system unchanged. Other set ups add weight to the aircraft. I believe the Flint tip tank system adds 35 lbs. The added weight of the fuel reduces useful load available for passengers or baggage, regardless of the system. Most 150s don't have a lot of useful load to spare.

Factory long range tanks are hard to come by. You either have to find a plane with them already or spend a lot of time tracking them down. A few people in this club have been looking for them, I don't think anyone has succeeded in getting all the necessary parts.

I do not have long range tanks in my 150/150. I considered looking for them but could not afford them at the time I did the conversion. Since completing the conversion, I've found that I don't really need them. Most of my flying is in the local area and less than 2 hours. For my normal use, the long range tanks offer no benefit. I also learned that by pulling the power back, I can fly legs that are about the same length as I used to fly with 100HP. Just because the power is there doesn't mean it has to be used all the time.

A 150HP conversion has 3 really wonderful benefits. 1) Improved rate of climb. 2) Improved service ceiling (the reason I did the conversion). and 3) They're a hoot to fly!

grin



David Rowland 7CO0
[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,559
Likes: 559
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,559
Likes: 559
Originally Posted by David_Rowland
I also learned that by pulling the power back, I can fly legs that are about the same length as I used to fly with 100HP. Just because the power is there doesn't mean it has to be used all the time.


And if done right, it'll burn less gas than a stock 150...



Right, David??? (remember that?) blush


[Linked Image from animatedimages.org] [animatedimages.org] [Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Imagine a united world.
Join the Popular Front for the Reunification of Gondwanaland.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 6
Member/1500+posts
Member/1500+posts
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 6
....I vote for Stella;-)
Originally Posted by Jim_Hillabrand
Originally Posted by Joshua_Ralph
I've finally settled on a name for N61112...



Well, Josh, if that's the yardstick you use to name a plane.....Sierra is being renamed H2O.

Wait a minute. That kinda sounds watered down so maybe Corona is better. smirk


Congrats on the flight home....your journey is only beginning.



Jim

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 14
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 14
And if done right, it'll burn less gas than a stock 150...



Right, David??? (remember that?) ..

Is that so David? I have been watching a 150/150 for a while, but have shy'd away because of the 22 usable gallons minus reserve, at 8 gph. I mostly just want to fly low and slow, up high in the hills.
So when a 150/150 is 150 pounds over mtow, do the wings take off without the rest of the plane? Does it just not leave the ground? Or is it just a matter more attention is needed to address the heavier plane? With the added hp I expect it would get off the ground. I'm thinking about two people in winter gear will definitely be over max gross, but the cold winter air will carry more weight. I think. ?
A 150/150 is more fun than a 172, right?


Todd
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,883
Likes: 989
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,883
Likes: 989
If I recall, David used less fuel than Poobs (Ed Pataky) each leg of the flight from
Huston to Clinton the year they Flew together.

Just because 150 might have 150 HP hanging on the nose doesn't mean you have to use them all during the entire flight.
Throttle back to normal 150 speeds and burn normal 150 amounts of fuel.


Ron Stewart
N5282B
KSFZ


[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,785
Likes: 545
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14,785
Likes: 545
Originally Posted by Ronald_Stewart
If I recall, David used less fuel than Poobs (Ed Pataky) each leg of the flight from
Huston to Clinton the year they Flew together.

Just because 150 might have 150 HP hanging on the nose doesn't mean you have to use them all during the entire flight.
Throttle back to normal 150 speeds and burn normal 150 amounts of fuel.


It works for Cardinal RGs, too. I have a 200HP engine but if I throttle back to just under 40% power, I can cruise alongside 150s at 6 GPH.

38% of 200HP is about equal to 75% of 100HP, i.e. - the normal cruise setting of a 150.

One item that really helps is a JPI FuelScan. Once you know *exactly* what your plane is burning, you'll have a far more comfortable feeling flying a 150/150 with stock tanks. Ed Figuli put one in Woodstock, I'm sure he'll pipe up soon.


-Kirk Wennerstrom
President, Cessna 150-152 Fly-In Foundation
1976 Cessna Cardinal RG N7556V
Hangar D1, Bridgeport, CT KBDR
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0