Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,157
Member/1000+posts
Member/1000+posts
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,157

It looks like you are right Mike. I was able to get the parts manuals side by side from the Cessna flight center/repair station here at X39. Boy my heart sank to learn the parts and part numbers are different. (and the diagrams most noticeably show the two fuel lines).

Fred - Some 152 flyer is going to be lucky to pick these up.

Our plan is to effectively create an OEM Aerobat wing with long range tanks. We'll keep working in that direction.


Dan
A150M TD; N9832J "Sassy"
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
I really don't think the needed mods are a deal killer, if somebody wanted to install these on a 150. The headliner will be out and the wings already off, so all it takes is punching four holes in the fuselage "rib" (to match the 152's fuel pickups) and installing a few pieces of the 152's plumbing. Certainly MUCH easier than modifying standard tanks in a 150's wing, plus you'll have less "unuseable" fuel... a plus in a tailwheel airplane. Since the 150 and 152 are on the same TCDS, this could be approved as an "upgrade".

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,473
Likes: 1018
Member/25,000 posts
Member/25,000 posts
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,473
Likes: 1018
Can't you just cap the extra fuel lines that the 150 doesn't need?


[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
The 152 fuel lines use pretty much the same routing and clamps as the 150. There's just more fittings and lines at the tank connections. The old 150 lines would be in the way, and why leave even that small amount of weight in the plane?

DANG! The one thing I forgot is a biggy! The 152 wings only provide for 30° of flap travel. That can be modified too by changing the flap tracks, bellcrank, actuator, and some linkage... but the job just got that much bigger.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2
Dan Offline
Member/5000+posts!
Member/5000+posts!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Hung
Can't you just cap the extra fuel lines that the 150 doesn't need?


That's what I was thinking.


Dan

Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities. (Mark Twain)


Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 1
M
Member/250+posts
Member/250+posts
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 1
I wouldn't call it a deal breaker and I like the idea of capping the forward drain point if you can get an inspector to buy off on it. I guess the only trouble would be fuel starvation in a low tank steep decent. As for running the added forward fuel lines, good luck with that. It runs inside of the door post. Without one to pattern it is very difficult, or it was for me, to make one. Plus, you will be cutting large holes in your post so you need to get that right. As for making Aerobat LR tank set up, they are just like the 152 tanks with the double drains. They do have additional sheeting sitting under the tanks. I think to beef up this area.

Mike


There are those that fly and those that wish they could.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0