|
| Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,157 Member/1000+posts | Member/1000+posts Joined: May 2005 Posts: 1,157 | It looks like you are right Mike. I was able to get the parts manuals side by side from the Cessna flight center/repair station here at X39. Boy my heart sank to learn the parts and part numbers are different. (and the diagrams most noticeably show the two fuel lines).
Fred - Some 152 flyer is going to be lucky to pick these up.
Our plan is to effectively create an OEM Aerobat wing with long range tanks. We'll keep working in that direction.
Dan A150M TD; N9832J "Sassy"
| | | | Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 18,962 Likes: 3 Member/15,000 posts | Member/15,000 posts Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 18,962 Likes: 3 | I really don't think the needed mods are a deal killer, if somebody wanted to install these on a 150. The headliner will be out and the wings already off, so all it takes is punching four holes in the fuselage "rib" (to match the 152's fuel pickups) and installing a few pieces of the 152's plumbing. Certainly MUCH easier than modifying standard tanks in a 150's wing, plus you'll have less "unuseable" fuel... a plus in a tailwheel airplane. Since the 150 and 152 are on the same TCDS, this could be approved as an "upgrade". | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 25,473 Likes: 1018 Member/25,000 posts | Member/25,000 posts Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 25,473 Likes: 1018 | Can't you just cap the extra fuel lines that the 150 doesn't need?
| | | | Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 18,962 Likes: 3 Member/15,000 posts | Member/15,000 posts Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 18,962 Likes: 3 | The 152 fuel lines use pretty much the same routing and clamps as the 150. There's just more fittings and lines at the tank connections. The old 150 lines would be in the way, and why leave even that small amount of weight in the plane?
DANG! The one thing I forgot is a biggy! The 152 wings only provide for 30° of flap travel. That can be modified too by changing the flap tracks, bellcrank, actuator, and some linkage... but the job just got that much bigger. | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,197 Likes: 2 Member/5000+posts! | Member/5000+posts! Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,197 Likes: 2 | Can't you just cap the extra fuel lines that the 150 doesn't need? That's what I was thinking.
Dan
Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities. (Mark Twain)
| | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 499 Likes: 1 Member/250+posts | Member/250+posts Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 499 Likes: 1 | I wouldn't call it a deal breaker and I like the idea of capping the forward drain point if you can get an inspector to buy off on it. I guess the only trouble would be fuel starvation in a low tank steep decent. As for running the added forward fuel lines, good luck with that. It runs inside of the door post. Without one to pattern it is very difficult, or it was for me, to make one. Plus, you will be cutting large holes in your post so you need to get that right. As for making Aerobat LR tank set up, they are just like the 152 tanks with the double drains. They do have additional sheeting sitting under the tanks. I think to beef up this area.
Mike
There are those that fly and those that wish they could.
| | |
| |
|