Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#16867 04/27/05 12:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Just curious. As I search thru classifieds, I happen to notice odd numbers on engines with conflicting numbers SMOH. I'll change the numbers slightly from what was posted, but, here's one I came across....

Quote
4,324TT 310SMOH 225 since new Millenium cylinders.


Confusing here...If the engine has 310 SMOH, why would it have 225 since the TOP. To me, not proclaiming to be an engine guru but fully understanding the mechanicals of it, it seems like that issue would've been addressed at the time of overhaul while the cylinders were off?

Maybe some of the members can enlighten me on why this would've been overlooked?

Thanx in advance,
Bengie Phillips
Columbus, GA
(ps, the sample signs are on their way to Lori...sshhhh!)


Message sent from a rotary pay phone...
Bengie



[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,062
Visit Put-In-Bay!!
Member/2500+posts
Visit Put-In-Bay!!
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,062
Maybe he leaned too much and scorched them?


-Bryan
U.S.C.G. licensed captain
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 643
Member/500+posts
Member/500+posts
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 643
Quote

Quote
4,324TT 310SMOH 225 since new Millenium cylinders.


Confusing here...If the engine has 310 SMOH, why would it have 225 since the TOP. To me, not proclaiming to be an engine guru but fully understanding the mechanicals of it, it seems like that issue would've been addressed at the time of overhaul while the cylinders were off?

Maybe some of the members can enlighten me on why this would've been overlooked?

If they only flew the plane say 10-20 hrs a year it could be about 5 years or more from the major to the top. Just a possiblity.


Mike H
BAX MI
72 150L N5454Q
Hazman #16870 04/27/05 06:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 607
Member/500+posts
Member/500+posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 607
Could be a typo. Could be years of inactivity.

Also, some folks overhaul the cylinders during a major
rather than replace them.


Stephen A. Mayotte

1978 Cessna R182 N7333Y
Boire Field
Nashua, NH
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
All valid points, but it's also possible the jugs weren't broken in right, and had to be redone. Lots of guys think you have to baby a fresh engine. Not so! You've got to run it hard enough for the rings to seat properly!

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Quote
Could be a typo. Could be years of inactivity.


I dunno, I've seen it in several classifieds and not just the Cessna 150/152 type. It just seems mighty strange to pull it all apart again and rehone, reassemble.


Quote
Also, some folks overhaul the cylinders during a major
rather than replace them.


I can agree with that, too. Personally, I'd rather have the new cylinders at overhaul, along with a nice set of roller rockers.... oops, they aren't approved.

Bengie Phillips


Message sent from a rotary pay phone...
Bengie



[Linked Image]
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 643
Member/500+posts
Member/500+posts
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 643
Quote


I can agree with that, too. Personally, I'd rather have the new cylinders at overhaul, along with a nice set of roller rockers.... oops, they aren't approved.

You would have to look at what year they overhauled it also. In the 80's and early 90's they didn't have the cylinders like they do now. So most would rehone and rework their cylinders. Now it is better to get the assemblied cylinders.


Mike H
BAX MI
72 150L N5454Q

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0