Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
J
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968

Already chatted with Beau. Nice fellow and sounds like a great airplane...BUT...standard tanks in the West and about $6500 to convert...well, not convinced I want to go that route. Also, I am getting quoted for insurance on a taildragger. It is NOT pretty at all for a zero time flyer. Almost would pay to rent a TD for a year then insure.

Thanks for the point out.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
J
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
Quote
GlaStar...a great airplane. Experimental is definitely the way to go Jeff. I have a bunch of friends who fly X aircraft. Now THERE's where common sense and sensible regulation still exists.

Same problemo I just discovered with the Glastar, however. Taildragger and insurance.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,062
Visit Put-In-Bay!!
Member/2500+posts
Visit Put-In-Bay!!
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,062
Cant the GlaStar be either or?


-Bryan
U.S.C.G. licensed captain
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
J
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
Quote
Cant the GlaStar be either or?

If built as a convertible....depends.

Jeff Davis #16058 04/15/05 07:11 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 543
Member/500+posts
Member/500+posts
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 543
I think that the Sportsman 2+2 is convertible trike/taildragger. What a nice plane with generous payload, like a Volvo wagon. I'd look at a Bearcat too.

I've considered building but with a 150 in the hangar I can't see myself in a garage with a rivet gun for 5 years instead of flying around in 24F. Maybe I'll change my tune when I retire but I'll never REALLY retire. As a musician there's always work out there that's fun. Next up is the touring Broadway production of Chicago. The band is on stage and I'm told that I sit just behind the chorus line. Talk about best seats in the house.

But I digress.......


Steve Thomas
1966 C150F N8224F
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 9
P
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 9
Bearhawk? A Bearcat is a warbird...

Putt Putt #16060 04/16/05 09:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 61
Member
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 61

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2
Dan Offline
Member/5000+posts!
Member/5000+posts!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,197
Likes: 2
The Sportsman 2+2 is a GREAT airplane! You could easily build one in about 3 months using the factory assistance program (2 or 3 weeks with your airplane at the factory will have everything done except avionics, interior, paint, etc.). BUT...I figure you're looking at about $120-150k to build a nicely equipped bird that way. OUCH!! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />


Dan

Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities. (Mark Twain)


Dan #16062 04/16/05 02:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,760
Quote
The Sportsman 2+2 is a GREAT airplane!

I'm kinda partial to the Murphy Rebel myself.

Bengie


Message sent from a rotary pay phone...
Bengie



[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,969
Member/10,000+ posts!
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,969
Quote
Now what?????


Well, I'm now back in the neighborhood and just came across your post. I think I understand where you are coming from, Jeff. Presently, I am wondering what my and Justina's flying future is going to be. With nearly 900 hours on the engine, surely that will be needing some expensive attention soon. Then there is hanger rent. Insurance. Other maintenance. The cost of fuel is constantly on the rise. Along with the Feds constantly adding new regulations and restrictions. Where is the breaking point? As much as I have dreamed of, and love to, fly, I am beginning to wonder.

As you know, I have been looking to possibly going to a Sparrowhawk. If it performs as well as I think it should, it would definitely be some added safety margin with the way we like to fly. But, a different plane will bring it's own unknowns with it. Especially those unknow expenses. Add that to the above, well, I think we'll just stick with 72G for the time being. She has proven reliable and has done well in what we have asked of her. We did just receive the replacement prop this week, so I will be looking forward to seeing what effect that has on the performance.

Even so, it is sad to contemplate, but I can see a future without an airplane. At least not a certified production aircraft. The kits are way too expensive. To build one's own truely useable two place airplane would cost a minimum of $40,000. Can't afford that. Maybe just an ultralight to putt putt around in now and then?

Well, with all things considered, I think we will just keep 72G for the time being and see what the future brings. We'll just not take any drastic steps and see where the trail leads.

But, anyways, good luck with what ever you decide, Jeff. Please be consoled that you are not the only one doing some hard thinking about flying in the future.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0