I think that's a great article! Mike Busch rarely puts anything in print that I can disagree with. 84G was one of those he talks about ( a good mid-time corrosion free airplane with cosmetic problems) that you can buy well below market (well .... not now ..... she's getting a well deserved restoration!)
Anyway, I called Scott McDonald yesterday and inquired about the 150/150 in Stuart, Florida. Seems it's in Ft. Pierce today, having an annual done (I noted that the current annual isn't due until June '06. What gives?)
I asked about the logs, which are supposedly complete since day one. The engine is an O-320-E2D and is past TBO, but is still running strong with compressions of 70+. The panel is unremarkable, except for an old Loran and ADF, and likely needs the navcom upgraded. She is not currently IFR certified (and may not be certifiable). The interior is complete but worn. The paint is old, and Scott described it as a 4 out of 10. I asked about damage history (the FAA database showed none), and was surprised by a disertation about damage history being a relative thing. "... one customer complained that replacing a rudder due to hangar rash meant 'damage history'!"
He never actually answered my question about this aircraft. [color:"red"]Red Flag! [/color]
My impression (still having not seen the plane) is that this might be worth an A&P/Pilot's attention, if he has the time and resources to restore this aircraft (I know I don't). I do not think it is a viable purchase for most buyers, who would pay going rates for upgrades, paint, and an overhaul. Someone could buy this bird and possibly fly it several hundred more happy hours before overhaul, but it will never be worth more than what it is now without pouring money into it.
