Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 12 of 14 1 2 10 11 12 13 14
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 3
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 3
Perhaps I oversimplified my statement. The 150 is very easy to fly, it is less easy to fly well.

At the time I last flew a 172, I was still a student and I took most of my training in a 152 that, for some reason, I ALWAYS had difficulty landing. It felt like the 172 almost landed itself.

I find my buddy's 185 extremely easy to land, despite a higher workload (manual flaps, constant speed prop, high sensitivity to trim), at least, until the tailwheel hits the pavement.

Perversely, despite having had lots of difficulty making nice landings in that 152 I trained in, Juliet is a real sweetheart to land. But it still requires more work than landing a heavier (thus, more stable) airplane.

Then again, it just may be my piloting skills ...

Reg

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,657
YEah Reg, I know what you mean.


Pat

Never run out of altitude, airspeed, and ideas at the same time.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
I always had a problem on the first couple landings after going from one to the other. Going from the 172 to the 150/152, I'd flare too soon, and float or porpoise to a touchdown. Going from the 150/152 to the 172, I'd plant it firmly on the runway, possibly from flaring too late! 30 minutes of T&G's always solved the problem. In calm air, I don't find much difference in the two, once I'm used to them again. It's when there's a little wind or turbulence that I can tell how much heavier the 172 is, or how much more responsive the 150/152 is! Different airplanes require different techniques is all I see in the comparison.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,729
Likes: 105
$
Member/10,000+ posts!
$
Member/10,000+ posts!
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,729
Likes: 105
For some reason when I fly older 172s I land normally. You know, a firm one in there every once and a while... but the newer 172S and R models... I have yet to do anything but a greaser. It might be the bigger motor up front, I don't know!

But 150s... I love them to death, but they are a PITA to fly spot on. Not that I CAN'T but they sure need a lot more work!


Jeff Hersom N3740J '67 150G "Gremlin"
Hangar W-6, Helena Regional Airport
Places I have landed Gremlin:
[Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com][Linked Image]
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,523
Likes: 554
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,523
Likes: 554
It's wild.

After flyin' a 172 or virtually anything else, I get in Mary Lou and it's a treat to be able to move the yoke with the slightest pressure.

Of course the higher wing loading on anything bigger than ours makes a difference. Our birds feel EVERY LITTLE breath of air.

150's - 152's were designed to do a particular job, and they do it very well!


[Linked Image from animatedimages.org] [animatedimages.org] [Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Imagine a united world.
Join the Popular Front for the Reunification of Gondwanaland.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Well, today was the day. I purchased 704LF, and I must say that she is a real beauty. I took her up for an hour test flight and she flies great. I think this is the first properly rigged 150 I have ever flown, since when I take my hands off the yoke she flies straight and true.

I took my wife out to the airport tonight to get her seal of approval. On our walk down the ramp, a 2006 Turbocharged Skylane with G1000 caught her eye. She said to me, "We need that plane next." My wife sat in the seats with me, played with the controls, and kept commenting about how nice the plane is. It's amazing how nice a plane can be when it has low time and a loving series of recent owners.

Thank you all for your excellent advice!
Attachments
63540-n704lf exterior.jpg (0 Bytes, 80 downloads)

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Member/15,000 posts
Member/15,000 posts
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18,962
Likes: 3
Outstanding!

I hope you're already planning the trip to Clinton 2007, because I'm sure we all want to see her up close!

Aaaaaahhh, yes!

I do love a happy ending!

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,797
Likes: 97
Member/7500+posts
Member/7500+posts
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,797
Likes: 97
Tim.

Thanks for the pictures, and thanks for taking us on the ride of finding and ultimately buying your plane.

Just a decent cross country flight, you had many obstacles to overcome. Good job, and congratulations both on the plane and on your wife. Sounds like you both will get to enjoy your new bird.

Hopefully we'll see you at Clinton next year.


Gary Shreve
When writing the story of your life, never, ever let someone else hold the pen.
[Linked Image]

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,523
Likes: 554
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
DA POOBS
Member with 30,000+ posts!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,523
Likes: 554
GOOD FOR YOU TIM!!!!!!

Congratulations!!! Many happy years of safe, enjoyable flying!!!


[Linked Image from animatedimages.org] [animatedimages.org] [Linked Image from visitedstatesmap.com]
Imagine a united world.
Join the Popular Front for the Reunification of Gondwanaland.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 506
Member/500+posts
Member/500+posts
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 506
Tim:

That's a nice looking airplane. It's even better when the wife likes it!! It will give you some good times and memories, I'm sure.

Don

Page 12 of 14 1 2 10 11 12 13 14

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0