Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Jim Hillabrand #280323 09/22/10 04:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 3
R
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
R Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 3
I've had only a couple of complaints about the airplane during my ownership, it was hard to start when hot, and the engine was too loud for my liking. I had the fuel injector servo overhauled, installed a high torque starter, and slickstart spark booster. Now it starts with about 5 seconds of cranking when hot (and just one blade turn when cold).

It turns out the internal muffler baffle tubes were completely shot, I replaced the exhaust with a brand new stainless steel unit in June. It is much quieter, and seems to run better too (hard to measure, but seems smoother and more powerful.) If I were going to keep it, I would increase the prop pitch slightly otherwise it's pretty close to perfect, except for cosmetics. Actually the doorpost, doors, and rear bulkhead plastics are all nearly new, so it's just the baggage area side plastics that need replacement.

Other stuff? Rosen visors, vertical card compass (new), LED beacon, LED nav lights (Whelen), Whelen Comet Strobes, Metco-air wingtips, cam lock cowl fasteners. The fuel system was completely refurbished when the MVP 50 was installed, new gaskets, caps and fuel senders, and stainless structural cover screws, which were installed using anti seize so the fuel tanks can be inspected or serviced in the future without drilling out screws. ( It took us two full days to get the tank covers off last time.)

One really neat about the airplane, the fuel tank feeds are almost perfectly linear. The digital fuel gauges show the same amount in both tanks the entire time, and there is usually less than a gallon difference between tanks when topping off. The fuel vent doesn't leak unless you fill it to the caps on a hot day, and then, only a very slow drip.

#280802 09/25/10 12:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
J
Member/2500+posts
Member/2500+posts
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,968
Having myself gone from a big nose 150 (no Superbat, however) to a 180 hp Cardinal, I can fully understand where Royson is coming from. The Red Bird is like stepping from a Miata to an BMW 528. Both capable and fun, but the luxury of the latter is just hard to live without. I miss my Cardinal greatly. The Cherokee 180 is a great little airplane, but for comfort and efficiency, the Cardinal was stellar (I guess that's a Blue Jay isn't it?).

I was looking in my log books and my flight from Hermiston to Clinton several years back showed an average fuel burn of 6.7 gph at 13,500 feet, and I ran on average about 125 knots. Normal cruise was 123 knots in mine at 75% power. It didn't climb out as well as the 150/150 (especially on hot days), but it was more than adequate and had a tired engine (the reason I sold it).

Good on ya Royson. I am thinking of selling my Cherokee too, but can't get enough money out of it to justify doing it right now.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0