I know how popular the 150 vs. 152 threads aren't.

So, after poking through old posts for awhile, I thought I'd ask a few specific questions.
First some background: I probably won't have the dough scraped up for my own plane for some time now, and I haven't even settled on a make and model (those Cherokee 140s look like a pretty good deal...) But, assuming I go with a Cessna, it will likely be a 150M or a 152. Maaaaaybe a 150L (I prefer circuit-breakers to fuses, and knots to mph, but they're not necessarily deal-killers for me.)
I'm 6'3", most of it legs, so the roominess of the later models is very important. As I understand it, the cabins, seats, etc., of the later 150s are not too different from the 152s. Correct?
The useful load, speed, and climb is likewise more or less the same, right?
So that leaves the engines. The MOGAS STC is a non-issue, since there's no airport around here for miles to get the stuff, and I'm not too keen on carting gas in from the local filling station. The difference in TBOs looks to be fairly well offset by the difference in overhaul costs, so that's probably no biggie either, right?
But then there's the lead problem. How bad is it really? I really don't want to be out in the boonies on a Sunday evening with a stuck valve.
Then again, I also don't want to be stuck in the boonies on a Sunday evening with a dead battery and a 28-volt system.

So you see my quandry...
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
- Jeff