No thanks. There's no benefit to me for agreeing to that, but there is potential for harm.
I had problems with some "self appointed internet police" threatening to report me to the FAA earlier this year because a partial Cardinal fuselage from which I salvaged a carry through spar had the same N number as a flying aircraft. The Cardinal was rebuilt from a wreck in 1980 and the aft part of the fuselage with the carry through ended up in a scrap yard in Tucson, where I found it. These were complete strangers who didn't appear in the FAA airmen or mechanic databases. They weren't interested in buying the spar. Yet, two of them demanded copies of the logbooks for their own inspection because they googled the N number from the pictures and decided they should take action. Another guy threatened to turn me in (for what, I don't know), but then offered to take the spar off my hands for dirt cheap because, he said "I know a guy who can fix it with the FAA".
There's too much information on the internet already and there's no way to control how it will be used in the future by trolls, fraudsters, AI bots, or the outright stupid. Imagine if I decided to rebuild one of the airframes into a flying aircraft, but you've posted pictures of it as scrap.
If any of these parts find new homes to help put another airplane back in the air, I will write the N number on it with a Sharpie so as to provide traceability for a mechanic and/or owner. I suggest you leave the keeping of airplane records to the FAA and not open yourself up to liability by providing alternative information. There's no need for you to take on the task of "closing the loop". You might find the activity to be fun and think you're doing something valuable (that nobody has appointed you to do, by the way), but I don't see any benefit to it.
