Originally Posted by Alex_Montgomery

Yeah, I'm gunning for a 182. Though slightly terrified of the costs! smile

The reasons why I changed my mind to a 182 (if this helps) were:

- The ability to go 140-145kts if I need to. I can always slow the plane down to a 172, but I can't speed a 172 up to 140kts.
- They are more stable than a 172, in my opinion. When I transitioned to the 182 after flying 172s for awhile, my first impression was that it was like comparing a Cadillac and a Toyota Corolla. Though heavier on the controls, it felt a lot more smooth and stable. Since I'm wanting to get into a lot more IFR flying, this helps.
- Cabin space. In a 172, you're touching elbows, at least. In a 182, there's room between the seats without much of an issue. Your legs have room to stretch out, it's fairly roomy.
- Range. Go Google the range of a 172 vs a 182... it'll surprise you. It's nearly double. smile
- Useful load. If the 182 has the 2950 MGW, you're dealing with about 100-200lbs more useful load than a 172.
- It future proofs me better. I want my next airplane to be THE airplane for me, the one that I keep for the next few decades. A 182 better future proofs me for that smile .

My wallet's still disagreeing with my decision, but I'm sticking to it for now! grin


I flew a 182 years ago, and noticed the heavier controls. It was not gusty that day, so I would not compare smoothness issues. Just was annoyingly heavy. IF, I really wanted to get a plane that will go fast, I would bypass the 182 and opt to an early model Beech 35. I got 40 hours in an A-35 (w/225hp engine) years ago, and loved it. Flying at 150 kts, at 10.5 gph! However, costs can be an issue, nearly double insurance, about 6 more hours on annual compared to the 172, wondering if that gear REALLY is locked down despite the indicators, W&B issues compared to the 172 (or even 182), etc. But.... having flown the 150 for SO LONG, if I got a 172/180hp...it would be a long while before the smile would rub off my face. grin