I found a 1961 Cessna 172 for $43,600 with 1350 Hours TT and 60 SMOH to new limits with new cylinders on 0-300.
Steven,
I am almost tempted just to tell you this sounds like a fantastic deal so you will finally join us that are actually flying. But...........................
I guess it is what you want to do with it, Steven. Many people finally convinced me that I did not want to go with an O-300 equipped 172. First off is power. Seems Continental was very generous in rating the O-300 145 horsepower. Closer to 135 horsepower seems more the reality. Plus, the O-300 has overheating problems. Overall, for just two people, I was convinced the 150 was the better choice over an older 172. If you want to have a back seat? Well?
As far as burning the auto fuel with ethinol? Personally? This would be of little concern to me. I am finding i am replacing most of the O-rings in 9ED since I purchased it, and it has never seen auto fuel in it's life. Entenol is not going to cause any further damage than to rubber components.
And let's talk about price. A really nice 1960 172 just sold here on our field for $28,000. When I was looking for the replacement for our 150, I consistantly found very good older 172's for mid $20 to lower $30's. I think you can do better, Steven. Unless, you just have money burning a hole in your pocket and you just need to spend it.
My advice, Steven? there is no such thing as a perfect airplane. Lower your standards, find a "good" airplane, and start enjoying flying, rather then just dreaming about it. We would love to have you join us up here in the skies
